I chose to post
about Lady Constance Lytton as Jane Warton who was forcibly fed whenever she
was going on a hunger strike. She delivered her speech at the Queen’s hall, January
31, 1910 (CP). Her speech was describing her experience with the hunger-strike,
she explains that woman unlike men do not need to resort to violence and use
weapons for what they are trying to protest for. If the government, parliament,
and the courts all refused what they are asking for which is a simple fair
hearing, than they must do what they have to do to get their attention. And that
is why these women have chosen the weapon of self-hurt to make their protest
(CP). She also goes further with her explanations that even if the government
continues to use their “unfair methods, with their abominable torture and
tyranny of feeding for force” (CP), women are still not going to give up on
what they deserve.
She
explains the force feeding as if “being killed-absolute suffocation” (CP). I like
how she explains the horrifying experience of force feeding by using words like
painful, suffocation choke, and writhes. And admits at that moment you forget
why you are protesting. But then you realize soon after why you are doing this,
and it’s because she thinks about the splendid heroes and heroines since the
world began, of all the martyrs, all the magnificent woman in this movement and
with that she feels tremendous gratitude (CP). Lady Constance describes her
terrifying experience not only does it give the audience sympathy but it
empowers the movement by convincing the other woman that you too can become a
member of their union and be part of the movement.
Questions:
Do you think the government actually took the woman seriously because there was
no violence but self-destruction? Was there any other way for woman to get the
attention of the government without hurting themselves??
No comments:
Post a Comment